<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://stamper.uvm.edu/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>I *hate* Windows XP 64-bit</title><link>http://stamper.uvm.edu/cs/blogs/mangot/archive/2009/04/20/I-_2A00_hate_2A00_-Windows-XP-64_2D00_bit.aspx</link><description>&amp;lt;fiber-free rant&amp;gt; When I purchased my Turion 64 (64-bit) laptop 3 years ago, I discovered that Windows had created a 64-bit version of the XP operating system. 'How perfect', thought I. 'An OS designed specifically for my zippy new processor, sign</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator></channel></rss>